[Introduction] The bar charts illustrate/detail/depict/elucidate noise levels in Europe in 2007 delineated/describe/detail by time of day and rural or urban location.
[Overall] Looking from an overall perspective//Overall, it is readily apparent that traffic was overwhelmingly the main source of noise, followed by trains, aircraft, and finally industry. Noise levels were also higher during the day in both rural and urban areas though cities were generally noisier at all times.
[B.P-1 ] Traffic noise in cities during the day and at night was very common, affecting 64 million and 48 million residents, respectively. Rural figures for traffic noise were approximately half as high at 34 million and 24 million. Turning to noise from trains, in cities, 10 million individuals were impacted in the day and 8 million at night. In rural areas, this data was only slightly lower (8 million and 6 million).
[B.P.-2 ] Aircraft and industry accounted for considerably less noise disturbance in 2007 with just 4 million and 1 million affected by flights in cities during the day and at night, in turn. 2 million residents also heard aircrafts at night in the countryside, with half as many aware of daytime flights. In terms of industry, the data for the countryside was negligible and in cities stood at 1 million impacted during days and 0.25 during nights.
Analysis
1. The bar charts detail noise levels in
Europe in 2007 delineated by time of day and rural or urban location. 2. Looking
from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that traffic was
overwhelmingly the main source of noise, followed by trains, aircraft, and finally
industry. 3. Noise levels were also higher during the day in
both rural and urban areas though cities were generally noisier at all times.
- Paraphrase what the table shows.
- Write a clear overview
summarising the differences.
- You might need another sentence
for your overview.
1. Traffic noise in cities during
the day and at night was very common, affecting 64 million and 48 million
residents, respectively. 2. Rural figures for traffic noise
were approximately half as high at 34 million and 24 million. 3. Turning
to noise from trains, in cities, 10 million individuals were impacted in the
day and 8 million at night. 4. In rural areas, this data was
only slightly lower (8 million and 6 million).
- Begin writing about the data for
the first categories.
- Make sure you compare as much as
possible.
- Keep describing and comparing.
- This one has lots of data so is
a little longer than normal.
1. Aircraft and industry accounted for
considerably less noise disturbance in 2007 with just 4 million and 1 million
affected by flights in cities during the day and at night, in turn. 2. 2
million residents also heard aircrafts at night in the countryside, with half
as many aware of daytime flights. 3. In terms of industry, the
data for the countryside was negligible and in cities stood at 1 million
impacted during days and .25 during nights.
- Write about the final, other
parts of the graph – include everything!
- Compare the categories.
- Finish all the data.
Vocabulary
The bar
charts detail noise levels in Europe in 2007 delineated by
time of day and rural or urban location. Looking
from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that traffic was overwhelmingly the main
source of noise, followed by trains, aircraft, and
finally industry. Noise levels were also higher during
the day in both rural and urban areas though cities were generally noisier at
all times.
Traffic
noise in cities during the day and at night was very common, affecting 64
million and 48 million residents, respectively. Rural figures for
traffic noise were approximately half as high at 34 million
and 24 million. Turning to noise from trains, in cities, 10
million individuals were impacted in the day and 8 million at
night. In rural areas, this data was only slightly lower (8
million and 6 million).
Aircraft and
industry accounted for considerably less noise disturbance in
2007 with just 4 million and 1 million affected by flights in cities during the
day and at night, in turn. 2 million residents also heard aircrafts
at night in the countryside, with half as many aware of
daytime flights. In terms of industry, the data for the
countryside was negligible and in cities stood
at 1 million impacted during days and .25 during nights.
Answers
Try to write down or think of an antonym/opposite word for further practice: detail show
noise how loud it is
delineated describe, detail
rural countryside
urban location from cities
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that traffic overall
overwhelmingly a lot more
main source where most comes from
aircraft planes
industry business, factories, etc.
higher larger than
though despite
generally overall
at all times always
common prevalent
affecting impacting
respectively in turn
figures data
approximately about
half as high 50%
Turning to next
impacted affected
slightly lower a lot less
accounted for was reported at
considerably less a lot less
disturbance being annoyed by
in turn respectively
residents people
heard listened to
half as many 50% as much
aware know about
In terms of concerning
negligible not important at all
stood at was at
0 Comments